John’s hometown, like many American municipalities, has enacted an ordinance that prohibits the killing of livestock animals, except by law enforcement officials, veterinary specialists, and licensed meatpackers and butcheries. The stated reasons for such an ordinance relate to public health and sanitation. Violations of the ordinance can result in fines, and in extreme cases, imprisonment.
John’s hometown has a significant Hmong community. Assume that members of that community legally purchased pigs or chickens and sacrificed them in public following the traditional Hmong procedure. None of the Hmong have the required license. Neighbors call the police, who issue a citation for violation of the ordinance. The Hmong explain that they were not aware of the ordinance, and that animal sacrifice is an age-old Hmong custom.
Barbara, prosecuting district attorney, and Juan, the lawyer for the Hmong, are developing the legal arguments for each side, which they will present to the presiding judge. If the Hmong stipulate that they are not licensed and did sacrifice the animals in public, how should the judge rule on their defense that the act is an integral part of the Hmong culture?
Issues and Study Questions
- Based on the overview above, what is the conflict?
- What are the beliefs at issue here?
- If you were a leader/policymaker, would you recommend any suggestions or changes to the ordinance?
- Why did the Hmong object to the ordinance?
- What could the Hmong community members/city leaders do differently?
- Why was religion an issue in this situation?
- What is the responsibility of city government/county attorneys/Hmong attorney in such a situation? What about other professions?
- Do you think there is a “right” and “wrong” way to handle this situation? Why? Why not?
- Have you faced similar conflicts in your own profession or personal life? If so, what were they? Were they resolved?
- What can be learned?
- Do you think education about religious literacy would have helped/harmed in this situation? How so?
Source: Religion and the Professions (General Honors 1030) taught by Dr. Jill Raitt, University of Missouri


The
Prayerful Patient
Mrs. Albert is 83 years old. She has multiple medical problems that are quite real and that produce chronic, progressive pain and weakness. She is on a number of medications, and she is faithful to the regimen her doctors prescribe. Nevertheless, nothing the doctors do seems to help her. On the other hand, her faith helps her to cope and to maintain independence and the church-related activities that are so important to her. She told her doctors, “Whenever you pray, you get healing from God.”
Mrs. Albert’s doctor is impressed by his patient’s fortitude, and he wants to understand better the relation of health to religion. He has read articles by Dr. Harold Koenig of Duke University, so he wrote to Dr. Koenig asking for some advice. Dr. Koenig’s answer regarding chronic pain and prayer has both medical and spiritual elements. Other doctors, however, disagree fundamentally with Dr. Koenig and explain differently the relation of Mrs. Albert’s prayer to her condition.
Issues and Study Questions
Source: Religion and the Professions (General Honors 1030) taught by Dr. Jill Raitt, University of Missouri